Giving every camera angle a job
An angle is not a camera position, it is an answer to a question the viewer asks.
You bought the second camera, possibly the third. They all point at you, they are all slightly different, and when you sit down to edit you find yourself cutting between them on a rhythm rather than for a reason, because none of them has anything the others do not.
The fix is to stop thinking about positions and start thinking about questions. At any moment the viewer wants to know one of three things: where we are, who is talking, or what the hands are doing. Give each question to one camera. Any camera left over gets a question of its own or it stays in the bag.
What question is each angle answering?
Three of them come up in almost every teaching video, and they arrive in roughly this order.
Where are we? Asked once at the start, and again whenever the viewer has been looking at a close-up long enough to lose their bearings.
Who is talking? Asked whenever the words matter more than the object. An explanation, an aside, a warning about the bit people get wrong.
What are the hands doing? Asked the moment the lesson turns physical, and never once answered by a shot of your face, however well lit it is.
The three standard jobs
The wide: where we are
Far enough back to hold you and your working surface in the same frame. Almost nobody watches it for long, and it is still the shot that makes the video feel like it happens somewhere. Use it to open, and use it to reset when a sequence of close-ups has left the viewer floating.
The close: who is talking
Head and shoulders, with a little space above your head and more space in the direction you are facing than behind you. This is the only angle where your face is doing the teaching, so it carries the explanations and the warnings, and it is the one worth lighting properly first.
The detail: what the hands are doing
Pointed at the thing rather than the person, tight enough that the object fills the frame. Frame it for the action rather than for the object sitting still, because a hand entering the shot needs somewhere to enter from. A frame cropped perfectly around a motionless bowl becomes useless the moment somebody reaches into it.
What does this look like in your trade?
In a kitchen
Face for the explanation, a shot across the counter for the preparation, a shot into the pan for the moment heat is involved. In a kitchen the composition that tends to hold is two angles on the person, one on the counter, and b-roll filling the joins. The person angles handle the talking, the counter angle handles the doing, and nothing gets filmed that is not answering something.
Teaching a physical skill
Face, an overhead angle on the hands, and one from the side. The overhead answers what are the hands doing. The side answers how is the body arranged, which is a separate question and the reason a straight-on face shot has never taught anybody to sit correctly at an instrument.
At a workbench
Face, a wide that includes the bench and where the tools live, and a close on the work. The wide does more here than it does in a kitchen, because in a workshop the arrangement of the space is part of the instruction rather than the backdrop to it.
How do you write a job down?
One sentence per angle, written before the shoot, in the same place you keep everything else.
Camera two exists so the viewer can see my hands on the keys. That is a job. Camera two is a nicer angle is not, and neither is camera two is for variety, which is the sentence people reach for when they have run out of reasons.
If you cannot finish the sentence without the word also, you have found the angle to cut.
What does an angle with no job cost?
More than nothing, which is the part that gets missed.
It has to be charged and formatted before the shoot. Framed and focused on the day. Offloaded from its card afterwards, lined up with the others so the sound matches the picture, colour matched so it does not look like it was shot on a different afternoon, then backed up and stored for as long as you keep anything. All of that happens whether or not it appears in the finished video.
Three cameras where two have jobs is slower than two cameras. It is also the setup most likely to produce an edit that cuts constantly and says nothing, because the angles are competing for the same moments instead of covering different ones.
The angle nobody thinks to add
Most people who film themselves teaching add angles to themselves. The one usually missing is the one showing what the viewer would see if they were standing where you are standing: over your shoulder, looking down at the work, from your own eyeline rather than from across the room.
It is the closest a video gets to handing somebody the thing and letting them try it, and it costs one phone on a cheap arm. Before the next shoot, write the three questions on a piece of paper and put a camera name beside each. Any camera left without a question either gets one or gets left in the bag, and the second of those is the shorter afternoon.
Keep reading
This is a service, and the method is written down.
Everything above came out of doing the work rather than writing about it. If you want the method instead of the story, it runs in order on one page.
Start with a free audit
Tell us where your content is now. We will come back with what we would change and what result to expect.
A person reads the channel and writes the audit by hand: a considered read typically takes three working days. That is the usual shape, not a promised turnaround. We use these details only to reply to you: no lists, no lurking.
What you will get
A fit snapshot: where your channel stands, and whether we are a match.
Two to three opportunities: specific, prioritised, yours to keep.
A recommended next step, even if that step is not us.
The audit is free and commits you to nothing: nobody follows up with a call you did not ask for.